Head in Syntax
Head (kjerne (i en frase)): the most important word in a phrase; the word that
carries the main meaning of the phrase and that cannot be taken away. The head
of a noun phrase is a noun (or a pronoun); the head of a verb phrase is a verb; the head of an adjective phrase is an adjective; the head of an adverb phrase is an adverb. As regards prepositional phrases neither part of the phrase (preposition + noun phrase)
is considered a head, since both parts have to be there in order for there to
be a prepositional phrase. Thus no part of it can be said to be the more
important one.
A
noun phrase consists of a noun and all its modifiers - i.e.
determinants, adjectives, and any clauses or prepositional phrases that modify
the noun. (We will get to clauses in a bit.) Traditionally, the noun is called
the head of the noun phrase, because it determines the syntactic
function of the phrase - that is, the phrase acts as if it were a noun.
Examples: "Bob", "the cat in the hat", "a whole other
problem", "the man who came to dinner", etc.
The
term “head of a construction” has been understood in various ways. The common
ground is that the head of a construction is that constituent whose
specifications are retained in the construction as a whole (cf. Williams
1981:247); exactly which specifications must be retained for headship to occur
is the mooted question.Webster’s 8th, after limiting its
definition to “an immediate constituent of a construction that has the same
grammatical function as the whole” gives as examples man
in “an old man” or “a very old man”. The head at least typically designates the
same entity as does the whole construction: “a very old man” is in fact a man.
Note as well that team and not football
is uncontroversially the head of football team even
though both components are nominal and thus would fit Webster’s definition.
Most English compounds are right-headed--e.g. bird is the head of black-bird, since
it, and not black, is nominal, and since a black-bird is a bird: similarly ball is the head of soccer-ball, ripe of over-ripe, green
of sea-green or blue-green
(contrast green-blue), etc.
Head in syntax is traditionally understood as a
constituent, which in some sense ‘characterizes’ or ‘dominates’ the whole
syntactic construct. Jespersen’s “primary ranking” of words, defined in terms
of semantic notion of definition, qualification, or modification; establishing
primary, secondary, tertiary, etc. words well reflect this idea, however this
does not seem to be the most effective approach.
The initial question is, that what notions must the
theory of grammar supply. Three such notions are needed, if we contrast syntax
with other components of grammar: semantics, the lexicon, and (inflectional)
morphology. The first of these picks out the constituent acting as the semantic argument (as opposed to the
semantic functor), the second picks out the subcategorisand
(the constituent that is lexically subcategorized), and the third picks out the
morphosyntactic locus (the
constituent on which inflectional marks will be located). In addition government and concord must also be accounted for, by some constituent being
‘dominant’ - the constituent determining government or the constituent
determining concord. These five notions can construct a theory of grammar,
consequently granting the independent primitive notion of HEAD unnecessary.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar